Forum Replies Created
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
We have a home strip, away strip, 3rd strip, and now a ransom strip!
2 users thanked author for this post.
Brilliant, sent mine in.
2 users thanked author for this post.
It is a mess that’s for sure, and I foresee legal challenges in the months ahead.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Maybe a joint venture with local council to develop the facilities so teh club can use them for training.
3 users thanked author for this post.
I think all but the most delusional realise that the appointment of Jimmy Dean was a *huge* mistake. He can barely string an articulate sentence together, drops players at a whim, blames players in post-match interviews, and has the tactical genius of a badger playing chess. Nothing about Jimmy Dean makes me think he is the man to turn the failed performances around, and going into next season with him as manager will likely be a waste of a pre-season.
Combine that with how Hilton announced the appointment of Jimmy Dean, the closure of the academy, the numerous U-turns, and worryingly you have someone with a history of making bad decisions. Some might say that the U-turns show he is listening to the fans. Whilst there is truth in that, you must wonder what thought and planning went into those decisions in the first place.
I’ve said this before, Hilton got off to a promising start with the payment of the tax bill, keeping the club afloat, and funding the squad. But since then, things have gone downhill faster than a shopping trolley full of fat kids.
For me, the jury is still deliberating, awaiting the ground purchase, and the publishing of his plans for the club.
6 users thanked author for this post.
The stats I posted were from the important part of the season, where we were playing the teams in and around us. Again, the stats don’t lie, his record, when it counts for Scunthorpe United a beyond poor.
2 users thanked author for this post.
1 single point from the last 21 available; with 2 goals score, 14 conceeded, and an average of 0.73 points per match.
The stats don’t lie.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I can see that SUFC will win tomorrow.
3 users thanked author for this post.
I might pop to Ilkeston on the way home! ;-)
1 user thanked author for this post.
@Deereyme66 – Thanks, if you cannot tell, one of my roles in life is elite and performance coach developer for UK Athletics. In fact I am in Birmingham tomorrow for some training and development, and the session theme is “Planning and initiating coach learning and development”. Lots of discussion will be had around the practice continuum, developing resilience, motivation etc.
2 users thanked author for this post.
One of the phrases that I have heard way too many times over the years is “They looked good in training” and seeing the team struggle.
You have to ask, what were they doing in training all week? Was it representative of what they are going to face on match day, or was it some simple tasks that made the players look good (unchallenged crosses, unchallenged passing etc.)?
Coaches often try to simplify a single task too much, making the task irrelevant or the relevancy reduced too much. An example could be ‘trying to beat a defender and deliver a cross to a striker who has players defending him. That could be too challenging for some players, so the coach removes the player to beat, or the defenders marking the striker. The player then looks good, he crosses the ball, and the striker meets the cross, burying the ball in the back of the net.
The manager / coach might look at that and say “they look great in training” however, this over simplified task has not taught the players how to cross under pressure, and the striker hasn’t been taught how to create space etc. Matchday comes, and we can’t get the crosses into our strikers, the strikers move like dustbins, we can’t score, lose the match and the manager says, “I didn’t see that coming, they looked good all week”.
In this specific case, practicing how to cross does not produce high action fidelity and is a perfect example of ineffective training.
3 users thanked author for this post.
@Ferrite – Pep is a good example of a manager who has successfully merged the older autocratic style with the newer more motivational / emotional style. I suspect the key to success for Pep (apart from a large cheque book) is the fact that his team have bought into the ‘why’, and Pep nurtures his players, allowing them to grow and feel confident of his support.
Something we seldom see these days at GP!
3 users thanked author for this post.
If the manager / coach(es) are shouting at the players during the match then the manager / coaches have failed in their respective roles. If the players are coached effectively week on week, the need to constantly shout, instruct, berate the players on match day would be dramatically reduced.
As I mentioned earlier, a good coach would give the players freedom to make not only in-play decisions, but also about the tactical approach for each match. For some reason many managers / coaches are stuck in the 1980’s and seem to believe that they should do all the decision making and thinking for players. Players need to fully understand what the tactics are, and their individual and collective responsibilities. If the players understand this, and are involved in the whole process you will see the players self-manage during the match, and can respond swiftly to in-play developments.
2 users thanked author for this post.
People are right to question Dean’s managerial ability, the results over the last five matches have been thus;
0-4, 0-0, 0-1, 0-2, 0-2
That’s one point from a possible 15, and zero goals scored.
We all want him to do well, as this would mean that we are getting decent results and the club would be climbing the table. The issue that many fans have is that we seem to be getting worse, week on week, and Dean appears to be unable to arrest the decline.
David Hilton took a gamble on Jimmy Dean and backed him with signings. It is clear to all but the most blinkered of supporters that the gamble did not pay off. Can Jimmy Dean turn things around? I hope so, however from what I have seen so far, I am sceptical.
These are my beliefs based on the results and performances I have seen over the last few months. Sadly I missed the Wealdstone win, in which I believe, we actually played well and looked cohesive. Since then we have definitely gone backwards.
If stating this makes me a troll, then so be it.
5 users thanked author for this post.
I feel sorry for Jimmy Dean, it wasn’t his fault that he was appointed in a job where it appears that he is out of his depth; that’s on Hilton.
Dean’s record at the lower regional leagues is impressive however, he hasn’t done well at Scunthorpe, averaging just 0.79 points per match. Even when you look at his record in the NLN it is not that impressive, with an average of 1.29 points per match.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/jimmy-dean/profil/trainer/107110
I honestly believe that if we had employed a more experienced manager, we would of likely gained enough points to avoid the drop, or at least dragged it out to the last match. Jimmy Dean’s points per match record at Scunthorpe (0.79) is actual worse than Neil Cox (0.86)!
2 users thanked author for this post.
It is not just about what the coaches / managers do in the technical area on matchday. What happens in training, in the changing rooms, and behind closed doors is just as important. What they learn during the week will be brought into the match play.
Set the players free, allow them to grow, and they will become better players who make better decisions.
3 users thanked author for this post.
” Evidence of the match results and team performances have shown that Jimmy Dean is clearly learning on the job, and at the expense of Scunthorpe United.”
Interesting you think that Daz, IMO he’s not showing any signs that he’s learnt anything since he’s been here. Same s**** almost every week, still thinks 4-2-3-1 is the best system for the current squad and that Pugh and Shrimpton are the MF answer.
Just because I said he was learning on the job doesn’t mean he is a fast learner. Some people learn quickly, some take longer, and some never learn despite how much time you give them. Jimmy Dean seems to be performing closer to the later of the three.
3 users thanked author for this post.
A good coach would give the players freedom to make not only in-play decisions, but also about the tactical approach for each match. This enables the players to grow, take more ownership of their own, and collective performances on the pitch.
Shouting and telling players what they should be doing only leads down the route of being unable to make in-play decisions effectively. Which in turn, undermines their confidence, and ensures that you will never get 100% out of the players.
4 users thanked author for this post.
In answer to OP question: it must be the person who appointed him, and that would be Hilton.
I am pleased that Hilton came in and paid the necessary bills to ensure the club were able to see the season out however, Hilton has scored a few own goals since taking the helm; firstly replacing Nelson just as he was getting a tune out of the team, secondly the way he announced the appointment of Jimmy Dean and thirdly, appointing Jimmy Dean. Evidence of the match results and team performances have shown that Jimmy Dean is clearly learning on the job, and at the expense of Scunthorpe United. Then let’s not forget the closing of GP / training in Ilkeston announcement, followed by a swift U-turn. This was quickly followed by another U-turn following the announcement to close the academy, and again more issues on how the academy players, parents, coaches etc found out!
If I were grading Hilton’s tenure to date I would grade him has a “D” and write “After initial promise David has gone through a challenging few weeks and needs to think ideas through thoroughly before announcing them. David needs to ensure that all parties who are impacted by any announcements / changes are informed before any changes are announced in the press, website, or social media. I would like to see David go into greater detail on his plans for the forthcoming season in the National League North, as well as his short, mid, and long-term plans for the club, ground, and training facilities.”
2 users thanked author for this post.
Whilst we can all agree that the u-turn was indeed a sensible choice, the worry for me was that he thought that was a good idea in the first place. IMO Hilton has not got off to a good start, but the jury is still out and I will wait to see what happens over the summer and into next season.
2 users thanked author for this post.
, 
