Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Don’t let Halifax have a cross. Usually leads to a goal.
I saw it as well Jackie. It was on Twitter. It had video and audio.
Dammed clever this technology stuff these days.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Sounds like 2 teams struggling a bit for goals.
Our defence is usually helpful enabling teams overcome their goal shyness. Plastic pitch as well at Bromley so probably won’t be tempted by the fairly generous odds.
On the Stella early tonight Renee?
2 users thanked author for this post.
NLN has a place with our name on it for next season.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Like all property and/or businesses it is worth whatever someone is prepared to pay for it.
Often that is rather less than the owners valuation.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Yes that was a good watch as well.
It struck me watching both yesterdays Premiership games what the game plan has to be whenever you play a team that has better players than you. You can’t let them settle on the ball and you must maintain a forward threat. Leeds did both for the whole game and Newcastle tried to do it but ran out of steam a little bit.
If you dont press the back 4 and the midfield the defenders start hitting decent passes and the midfield are able to find space. Against poorer teams and if you have a decent defence you might get away with it but not against a bit of quality.
As we demonstrated once again on Saturday we never do this. The back four steps back 10 yards and the midfield sit on their toes. Decent sides then use the freedom of the park to murder you as Solihull showed.
Nuttall had bullied their centre backs for an hour but then was knackered. He should have been replaced by Carver at that point to keep the pressure on their centre backs. At the very least Carver should have joined Nuttall to share the workload. Beeston stepped up to provide a threat to them and was promptly replaced while Butterfield and Feeney were no longer providing any threat. Was Beeston substituted because he was pushing forward?
I don’t know if we do this because Hill tells them to do it or we are just not fit enough or resilient enough to play on the front foot for 90 minutes.
My biggest problem with Cox was that he actually had the team starting games like this.
What we have seen of the National League so far suggests the biggest difference relative to Leagues 1&2 is a lower quality of defending. It does seem though virtually any team is capable of scoring a goal or two.
The way forward for me is to press teams for 90 minutes. Score a goal and repeat if you can until the final whistle goes.
This managing the game malarkey does not work in this league – certainly not with a defence like ours.
2 users thanked author for this post.
City are great to watch if a team is prepared to take them on like Newcastle did yesterday. It is when sides play the 2 banks of 5 to keep the score down that they get very tedius to watch. Passing for passing sake is really dull – not that I blame City. They just keep the ball and wait for the inferior sides to make mistakes.
Personally I love the way Liverpool play simply because they play their game their way whatever the opposition do and just try to score a goal. When they succeed they try and score another one. I am old enough to remember when Manure used to do that.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Very good grey lag. As said above, two wins from two is a very good start but squad is paper thin in terms of back up. If we had the options we wouldn’t have lined up with Daniel as a left sided attacker, would we ?
I hope we get some more players in soon.
I could perhaps understand Hill using Daniel as a left sided attacker. Not so sure why he played almost exclusively on the right against Solihull. Feeney who built his career as a right winger/ right sided forward was on the left.
I have nothing against wide forward spending 20 minutes or so on their “wrong” side to give defenders a different problem but spending 80 or 90 minutes on the wrong side seems a bit extreme.
Given our record of helping teams end a losing run I think the Halifax game is our least likely 3 points out of the next 7 games.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Hope he goes to the board of directors and requests relieving Hill of his duties and taking the roll himself as well as being acting chairman, if anyone could get the players on board it would be him, comes across as being in the same mould as Adkins.
Why not stick a broom up his backside and he can clean Glanford Park while he is at it?
4 users thanked author for this post.
Young Wallace is the other sub
1 user thanked author for this post.
You get pretty good goat dishes including curries in India.
Dishes claiming to be lamb are actually goat. Only if it is called “imported lamb” will it ever have had even the briefest relationship with a sheep.
Got to agree with Deery on this one. The only thing that matters is when we have a either a club statement confirming change of ownership or an announcement by new owners. Anything up to that point is speculation even (or perhaps especially) if it is based on something the elephant in the room has said.
Fans of the club have 2 realistic choices. We either take solace that Mr Swann seems no longer to take part in the day to day running of the club and get behind those trying to rescue it from its deathbed or we have nothing to do with the club until new ownership is confirmed.
If you are in the second category then why are you wasting your time on here?
I am fed up with the whole sad saga and would prefer to not hear or read another word on the subject until proper confirmation is out in the public domain. Just look at our fishy friends down the road – it may take some time.
7 users thanked author for this post.
Early days I know but.
Helped in part by easy wins against the Iron those 2 small clubs are in the top 5.
The team we beat is in the relegation zone.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Best commentary moment so far from Nigel. Taft attempts a pass. “When you see a pass like that you wonder if he has his boots on the right feet”.
The gentleman that he is he followed up with “not being disrespectful”
8 users thanked author for this post.
If you have not already sorted it Les you can hear Nigel’s dissapointment live here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_radio_humberside
We are very bad BLT but we did win one of the last 35. It was against Oldham so it only just counts.
Woke up feeling positive last Saturday and changed my Yeovil prediction from a 1-1 to a 2-1.
Woke up feeling the same today so changed my 1-0 prediction for the Woking game to 1-2. Also stuck a tenner on the win.
Dammed expensive this optimism.
You could always take the stairway.
Has he ever been a regular anywhere?
Bottom rung probably.
I think the correct answer is b but substantially true of the other 2.
Not sure Glanford Park was ever one of the best though.
I thought Chris Martin was giving him a lift home.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Thanks for that WG. Great advice.
1 user thanked author for this post.
It would be good to hear from someone who actually saw the game.
Forgot to mention Nuttall getting a couple of goal is no bad thing.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Let’s hope the first half was a brief homage to the last 4 seasons of slapstick defending.
Difficult to tell from 75 minutes of radio commentary but some positives.
We have a plan B.
A brief return to 4-4-2. In my view the right tactics for this level.
We came back and gave it a go.
Also I see Yeovil held Wrexham so they are not such a poor team.
Maybe the bookies have spotted we have had one away win in the last season and a half.
That was at fellow basket case club Oldham.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
AuthorPosts