Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267086
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    A baby in the womb,weeks away from birth,in your opinion had no protective rights and can be killed without punishment to the killer is your position. You need to think hard about your worldview and callous way of thinking.

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267085
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Even though a baby in the womb ( a separate human being to the mother) is being sustained by the mother, the right to murder the baby in the womb,is as wrong as murdering the baby after it has been born.

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267083
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Should a woman be able to kill her baby after it has been born?

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267074
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    “Please elaborate,”….ok.
    If a person in our society ,in the everyday life of our culture,kills a person intentionally,and this person is totally innocent,what should the “just” sentence be? Does that make it clearer?
    Rather than the usual ad-hom attacks, maybe a serious reply to the question would be interesting.

    in reply to: Goal Fest #267019
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Maybe Trinity should have brought on Russ Green to shore up their defence,Mick!?

    in reply to: Goal Fest #267012
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    There will be a lot of gritted teeth tonight.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266959
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266847
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    “As with COVID,backsides were kicked,result,speed.
    Oh dear,if that is how the system works😂
    Nothing replaces time and controlled analysis that requires years of study for it to be given approval ( that’s how it use to be!)
    The truth is this rushed through “emergency drug” didn’t have 100% security- how could it?? The consequences are being seen around the world.

    in reply to: Closing academy #266837
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    ..by the way Fans64,have you a season ticket this season?

    in reply to: Closing academy #266836
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Patrick,” they must be devastated today that Scunny won.”
    During our” golden era “I sat at home many nights thinking the same thing.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266835
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Tests on new virus vaccines can take a minimum of 10 years or even longer to be allowed and deemed safe. This was not the case with the Covid vaccines,they were an emergency vaccine,with not the same level of scrutiny . Even now the large adverse reactions to this emergency drug are not being investigated,the evidence is out there ,but the media remain silent.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266782
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266781
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    ..but the idea anti vaxxers are the same people who refused the Covid vaccine is a false presupposition . There’s your problem, trying to equate anti vaxxers with people who refused the Covid vaccine. If you state to me anti vaxxers are not every person who refused the Covid vaccine,I would agree with you. Tried and tested vaccines with ten and even more years of careful research – and results of any serious side -effects analysed,should be taken no doubt. Those that haven’t and have serious side -effects shouldn’t.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266776
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    ..did you read my post at 6.44am-I response to your accusation I didn’t say anything about the opening post.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266774
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Some crackpot on YouTube- not Dr John Campbell?
    The problem is ,you are muddying the waters.
    The official reports around the world ,reported with integrity,are clearly showing significant concerns regarding the Covid vaccine,but your blinkered presuppositions will not investigate these claims,unfortunately.

    in reply to: The Missing Three Players #266772
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    ..that must be wrong,he uses Kingstons chippy.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266771
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    By the way when you lump anti vaxxers with people unwilling to take the Covid vaccine,you are muddying the true story. Most people who refuse the Covid vaccine are not anti vaxxers,They refuse to take a vaccine that is now showing,through study,an alarming risk of serious side-effects.Most willingly take tried and tested vaccines. There’s the problem will the opening post.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266770
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Do give your reference point for “mr. bar magnet” Dr.John Campbell – thanks,if not you will be accused by me of making it up as you go along.
    My facts are official facts open to public scrutiny,which the main stream media will not report on.

    in reply to: A Proper Manager #266769
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Can you remember the days when Brian Laws came in the radio and said he was disappointed because we had 20 plus attempts on goal and only scored four!

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266751
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Your “get out “ conspiracy theory is just showing your blinkered presuppositional position. All the evidence in official documentation is clearly seen in these videos,they would be banned if there was any false information! The media is adamant this information will not be made known to the general public, for obvious reasons.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266744
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Please give your evidence of this claim!
    Like I say ,official papers have been released that the main stream media will not report on.
    You seem to be blind to your presuppositions,so I will leave you with the video,so you can ponder on it.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266741
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    “ I didn’t realise a YouTube channel is an official paper”?
    He was reporting on an official paper!!
    “ I am not commenting on such”.
    Of course you’re not because your presuppositions would be destroyed.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266738
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    Sounds like a reliable source/sarcasm.
    Can you explain your sarcasm from an official paper?

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266737
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    In a sense you’reright about “ no-one”opposes measles vaccinations.
    The accusation was the “unvaccinated Covid” people were to blame. Far from the truth.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266734
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266724
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    The evidence is out there ,reported by official papers,that there is an alarming increase in deaths,compared to pre- Covid levels. The statistics are also clearly being seen all over the world, and it isn’t covid that was the cause. Look into it,the main stream media will not report on these official reports.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266716
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    …no-one against tried and tested vaccines.There’s your problem.
    The reliable evidence ( which the main stream media won’t report on) is out there,if you just look for it.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266715
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    “…died suddenly” the new buzz words. I wonder why?

    in reply to: Odds. #266634
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    5/2 fav to win national league north – William Hill.

    in reply to: Ilkeston #266593
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 109

    The problem is Patrick,99% or more Scunthorpe fans are genuine guys,as you say.
    Unfortunately the less than 1% are a substantial number on this site.
    The majority of fans I speak to,and I ask,do you go on Iron Bru,they look at me with a blank stare,thankfully.