Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #267583
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    I also wonder if any have (posting on here)studied these findings. I very much doubt it. I’ll start with you,Siderite,which paper did you find the most compelling?

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #267581
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    The ad- hom attacks are laughable.
    These references , do you understand any of them?
    John Campbell goes through scientific papers,with analysis , not veering from given facts.
    Your counter evidence has no substance- unless you can enlighten me further?
    “Waiting for another cartoon”, to show your intelligence.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #267570
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    “They’re linked in the article”,so I don’t see the point?
    Come on rub my face in it, put the evidence on here, show the rest of here that your sources are sound.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #267568
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    “…these published studies”( show vaccinated people aren’t more likely to die than unvaccinated people)Could you put them on here to validate the claim?

    in reply to: Doncaster Rovers #267282
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    Callum Roberts came on 2nd half. When he skipped past 3 Donny players are had a cracking shot saved was an eye opener to his undoubted ability.

    in reply to: Friendly. #267259
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    IF Callum Roberts stays fit,he will give us some special moments this season.

    in reply to: Understanding Cultural Marxism. #267249
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    in reply to: Doncaster Rovers #267232
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    …hopefully most of us will be looking down.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Mark Jackson guest in Restaurant on Saturday. #267201
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    My first contribution!

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267154
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    JI.”Suggesting that the world would be a better place if Jesus had been aborted is a statement that I wish you had not made ..not for my sake ,orGod’s..but for yours.”
    BUT NI doesn’t believe in Jesus,JI. Why for NI’s sake do you think this(?)when he professes his unbelief in Christ.
    Why not ask him,why do you wish a fictional character,according to you,should have been aborted for a better world?

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267092
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    So if someone kills a baby weeks from birth,Siderite,should there be a “just” sentence to reflect the seriousness of the crime? Should the crime be considered as serious as a person murdered in every day life?

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267089
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    “A baby is sustained by the womb?”
    What about a baby weeks from birth? You still agree that is not murder?
    Please explain in your intellectual words why it’s not?
    Maybe go back to your fallback ad-hom attacks?
    Then again ,I might be able to prise a coherent answer from your good self.

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267086
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    A baby in the womb,weeks away from birth,in your opinion had no protective rights and can be killed without punishment to the killer is your position. You need to think hard about your worldview and callous way of thinking.

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267085
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    Even though a baby in the womb ( a separate human being to the mother) is being sustained by the mother, the right to murder the baby in the womb,is as wrong as murdering the baby after it has been born.

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267083
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    Should a woman be able to kill her baby after it has been born?

    in reply to: Killing a person intentionally. #267074
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    “Please elaborate,”….ok.
    If a person in our society ,in the everyday life of our culture,kills a person intentionally,and this person is totally innocent,what should the “just” sentence be? Does that make it clearer?
    Rather than the usual ad-hom attacks, maybe a serious reply to the question would be interesting.

    in reply to: Goal Fest #267019
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    Maybe Trinity should have brought on Russ Green to shore up their defence,Mick!?

    in reply to: Goal Fest #267012
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    There will be a lot of gritted teeth tonight.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266959
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266847
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    “As with COVID,backsides were kicked,result,speed.
    Oh dear,if that is how the system works😂
    Nothing replaces time and controlled analysis that requires years of study for it to be given approval ( that’s how it use to be!)
    The truth is this rushed through “emergency drug” didn’t have 100% security- how could it?? The consequences are being seen around the world.

    in reply to: Closing academy #266837
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    ..by the way Fans64,have you a season ticket this season?

    in reply to: Closing academy #266836
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    Patrick,” they must be devastated today that Scunny won.”
    During our” golden era “I sat at home many nights thinking the same thing.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266835
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    Tests on new virus vaccines can take a minimum of 10 years or even longer to be allowed and deemed safe. This was not the case with the Covid vaccines,they were an emergency vaccine,with not the same level of scrutiny . Even now the large adverse reactions to this emergency drug are not being investigated,the evidence is out there ,but the media remain silent.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266782
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266781
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    ..but the idea anti vaxxers are the same people who refused the Covid vaccine is a false presupposition . There’s your problem, trying to equate anti vaxxers with people who refused the Covid vaccine. If you state to me anti vaxxers are not every person who refused the Covid vaccine,I would agree with you. Tried and tested vaccines with ten and even more years of careful research – and results of any serious side -effects analysed,should be taken no doubt. Those that haven’t and have serious side -effects shouldn’t.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266776
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    ..did you read my post at 6.44am-I response to your accusation I didn’t say anything about the opening post.

    in reply to: Thanks anti-vaxxers #266774
    billpuntonsghostbillpuntonsghost
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 102

    Some crackpot on YouTube- not Dr John Campbell?
    The problem is ,you are muddying the waters.
    The official reports around the world ,reported with integrity,are clearly showing significant concerns regarding the Covid vaccine,but your blinkered presuppositions will not investigate these claims,unfortunately.