I wasn’t trying to convert you to Christianity,FiftyPence.
The videos were discussions between atheists and a believer in a Creator.
The outcome was most revealing.
But hey,i’m not trying to get one over on you ,just wanting you to think through your presuppositions.
If your not interested so be it,but I tried.
You didn’t watch the video,obviously.
It was a debate between an atheist and a Christian.
Who had the better argument for the existence of God?
I await your response.
Always realised you give a great deal of thought to the meaning of life.
If you think we are just going to end up as “worm food”,why bother responding?
Just live you life,be merry until the light switch is switched off.
What’s the point wasting your life on pointless drivel?
You know there’s more to life than that,though.
Romans 1 v21
For although they knew God,they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him,but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened.
… not philosophical concepts,but actual truth.
Laws of Logic is not a philosophical concept,they are abstract,immaterial,universal and objective and are part of our understanding of our existence.
Your idea my words have been a philosophical concept is false.
You are a materialistic atheist who believes all that exist is matter in motion.But of course laws of Logic are not matter.
Therefore laws of Logic cannot exist if materialism is true.Not only are you unable to account for the existence of laws of Logic,they are actually contrary to your worldview.
Your worldview is necessarily irrational .
Give it some thought.
If we evolved into humans in your evolutionary understanding,where did abstract ,immaterial,universal,absolute laws of Logic come from in this evolutionary process?
It is not the transcendental argument for God.
Where do the laws of Logic come from?
The atheist believes in a physical universe,we are just atoms in motion,there is no after life etc.
The evolution aspect is your belief,big bang etc.
Where do the laws of Logic come from,abstract,immaterial,universal,absolute ,in your evolutionary worldview?
I wait for your response FiftyPence
Going back to my earlier posts,in your materialist atheistic worldview within only a physical universe,how do you explain the laws of logic that are abstract,immaterial,universal and absolute?unfortunately you can’t.You do know the answer ,but are suppressing the truth.
No one is suggesting BELIEF in air is necessary to breath,but rather the FACT of air.likewise,no one is suggesting that professing belief in the Bible is necessary to use logic,but rather the Bible must be factual in order for use of logic to be reasonable.
You can say ,I can reason just fine,I don’t believe in the Bible.But this is the same mistake as someone who’s a critic of air saying “ of course air isn’t necessary to breathe, because I don’t believe in air and I can breathe just fine.”
Logical reasoning is possible because biblical revelation is true.You as a materialistic atheist can reason,but within your own worldview you cannot account for your ability to reason.
BPG- if there were no human beings on Earth would the laws of Logic exist?
Siderite- Yes,but there would be no species able to interpret them.
Where would they exist? You claim there isn’t anything beyond the physical universe.
You are a materialistic atheist who does not believe in anything beyond the physical universe,yet you believe in abstract immaterial universal laws of Logic.You need to think this through.
But that’s not the issue. You are a materialistic atheist who does not believe in anything beyond the physical universe ( correct me if I’m wrong) Laws of Logic are not matter,but you claim they exist ,even if no human beings exist?
Laws of Logic are abstract and immaterial,yet you claim if there were no human beings on Earth they would still exist?
How does that work out in your worldview?
