Ewing to forest green

Iron Bru Forums Blast Furnace Ewing to forest green

  • Author
    Posts
  • #321559
    WonderGoalsWonderGoals
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 27, 2013
    Topics: 105

    Westbrooke was tidy enough but him and rowley were too alike and we lacked any real go forward from CM. I’d rather have Beestin, Rowley and whoever is brought in to play alongside those two. I walways felt we were too conservative with Westbrooke in there instead of Beestin.

    Roberts will obviously be the biggest miss. If we can get Sellers flemming on a season loan, he’ll be replaced adequately. I wonder if Connor Smith will be given a shot in CM or give him another go out wide ?

    Smith has to improve, surely !

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321560
    Iron64iron64
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 26, 2013
    Topics: 5

    “Beestin when properly fit is better than both of them because he creates things and has a goal in him. Not quite as defensively disciplined as Westbrooke and Ewing so our cautious manager never started him unless he had to.” 100% agree

    #321564
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 5

    If you’re referring to the link I put above, I’d disagree, unless the option was in Ewing’s favour, which is possible but unlikely.

    I don’t think it was ever an option in the club’s favour. There was an interview with Butler half way through the season where he confirmed that, but the explanations have never been clear. I’m reliably informed it will be explained in detail when his departure is announced.

    So according to this, the option was in the club’s favour…
    https://www.scunthorpe-united.co.uk/news/2026/june/oli-ewing-leaves-the-iron-for-undisclosed-fee/

    …but was effectively meaningless as Ewing was allowed to reject the “option” within seven days of the end of the season.

    Technically the retained list published on 8th May may have been accurate, given our last match was on 3rd May and Ewing may not have rejected it when published, but it’s the least effective option I’ve ever come across as it doesn’t appear to have had any benefit to the club whatsoever if still required to offer an improved contract to retain compensation rights.

    Given what was published…
    https://www.scunthorpe-united.co.uk/news/2026/may/iron-retained-list-2025-26/

    …does anyone have a clue as to the current status of the “option activated” on Branden Horton?

    #321565
    saleironsaleiron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 31
      I don’t know the answer, but I guessed Ewing was definitely leaving when his family left the Rochdale game when he was subbed on the 66th minute. I’d love to know what we offered compared to FGR and the “undisclosed” transfer fee.
    #321571
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 185

    Well bugger me didn’t realise we had such dross playing for us and there was me thinking they were the main stay of our team.
    Underplaying it or what.
    F ing disgrace that the club have let him leave for Fgr.

    No one on here or elsewhere has said they were dross. I think ‘replaceable’ or ‘unessential’ would be more like it.

    #321572
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 185

    its not looking to positive for next season as it stands but thats what happens when theres no money in the bank.
    At least we still have a club (not heard that gem for ages just thought i would drop it in)

    These are, of course, fair points to make over and over.

    They really are. Kind of bizarre that ‘at least we have a club’ has become the devil’s spawn.

    Using it to excuse a lack of ambition is the devil’s spawn.

    The Board are ambitious – they thought FC100,000 was the answer.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321576
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    But no-one else in the entirety of English football has taken up their irresistible offer.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321577
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    and the club remains arsy towards fans and groupings that had the temerity to question the boards wisdom on this one issue.

    #321580
    mistertonmickmistertonmick
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 115

    Positivity Dave said he blames Oli Rose for him going, his flatmate, if true a poor excuse

    #321581
    NorthumbironNorthumbiron
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: January 3, 2014
    Topics: 73

    Perhaps he’s vegan?

    #321583
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 185

    Positivity Dave said he blames Oli Rose for him going, his flatmate, if true a poor excuse

    He also thanks Ewing for ‘allowing us to be part of his football journey’. Please tell me that’s sarcasm?

    #321590
    stephenkeaneBoyceBullet26
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: August 19, 2022
    Topics: 0

    If you’re referring to the link I put above, I’d disagree, unless the option was in Ewing’s favour, which is possible but unlikely.

    I don’t think it was ever an option in the club’s favour. There was an interview with Butler half way through the season where he confirmed that, but the explanations have never been clear. I’m reliably informed it will be explained in detail when his departure is announced.

    So according to this, the option was in the club’s favour…
    https://www.scunthorpe-united.co.uk/news/2026/june/oli-ewing-leaves-the-iron-for-undisclosed-fee/

    …but was effectively meaningless as Ewing was allowed to reject the “option” within seven days of the end of the season.

    Technically the retained list published on 8th May may have been accurate, given our last match was on 3rd May and Ewing may not have rejected it when published, but it’s the least effective option I’ve ever come across as it doesn’t appear to have had any benefit to the club whatsoever if still required to offer an improved contract to retain compensation rights.

    Given what was published…
    https://www.scunthorpe-united.co.uk/news/2026/may/iron-retained-list-2025-26/

    …does anyone have a clue as to the current status of the “option activated” on Branden Horton?

    Horton’s option was appearance-based and was triggered earlier in the season: https://x.com/HumbersideSport/status/2029874648788140444

    Ewing said something along the lines of his option having a few criteria that needs to be met: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0lwd6f2

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321591
    TheJuryeffsOutTheJuryeffsOut
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 1, 2023
    Topics: 12

    I can live with Ewing, Westbrooke, Roberts or in fact any of them going. Unfortunately it’s welcome to reality. We can’t compete with the big spenders in our own league and never will until someone with money to burn turns up and decides to burn it with us.
    I’m glad the club aren’t breaking the bank on any of these characters and I don’t blame any of them for taking the money elsewhere.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #321592
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 5

    Horton’s option was appearance-based and was triggered earlier in the season: https://x.com/HumbersideSport/status/2029874648788140444

    Ewing said something along the lines of his option having a few criteria that needs to be met: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0lwd6f2

    [/quote]

    At least the Horton option gives the impression that somebody at the club understands how options are meant to work.

    In the case of the Ewing one, an option that needs to be agreed by both parties might as well not exist. As Ewing himself said in that interview, “it’s effectively a one year contract”, which indeed it turned out to be.

    For him to have stayed any longer, another contract was always going to be needed, except in the highly unlikely event that Ewing felt he was lucky to have the existing one and wanted to keep the same terms.

    I’d genuinely welcome any explanation as to the purpose of the option that the club activated, given it had no validity unless Ewing inexplicably neglected to reject it in favour of negotiating new terms either here or elsewhere. Any ideas?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321593
    saleironsaleiron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 31

    Was it simply to get a transfer fee? Cant think of any other reason.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321594
    Iron-aweIron-awe
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 21, 2017
    Topics: 16

    Let’s be right the club chased Ewen and when he said I’m only signing a one year deal then I will see, the clubs choice was to sign him or not. The fact they inserted the option addition and said to Ewen that gives us a little leverage over a fee for you then both parties agreed to it. I’m sure Ewen has had plenty of offers and he’s taken the most lucrative that suits him, fact it’s with a team in our league is neither here or there it’s all about money that suits both parties, good luck to the lad it’s a short career get what you can mate.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #321599
    AwaywegoAwaywego
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 20, 2017
    Topics: 195

    Let’s hope Rob Smethurst wants to pump money into our club.
    Being relieved of his chairman’s duties at Macclesfield, certainly done a sterling job there and not being scared to splash the cash to rise up the leagues.

    #321600
    Iron-aweIron-awe
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 21, 2017
    Topics: 16

    Let’s hope Rob Smethurst wants to pump money into our club.
    Being relieved of his chairman’s duties at Macclesfield, certainly done a sterling job there and not being scared to splash the cash to rise up the leagues.

    What are the reasons for him leaving Awaywego are you in the know?

    #321601
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 5

    Was it simply to get a transfer fee? Cant think of any other reason.

    Possibly, but compensation is due for players under 24 if they have been offered a contract regardless of such an option, and the club stated that they had to offer a new contract “to retain compensation rights should the midfielder decide to move on”, which suggests that the option itself didn’t achieve this.

    I can understand the club not wanting to go to a tribunal, but they state that “the two clubs negotiated over a transfer fee to mitigate the need for a tribunal”, which suggests that the option didn’t help on that score either.

    #321604
    AwaywegoAwaywego
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 20, 2017
    Topics: 195

    Something to do with controlling and coercive behaviour, arrested on the 19th of may, and once the herd get going there’s no stopping them we all know that to our cost.

    #321607
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 103

    Aye. There were plenty wanting to build statues or avoid healthcare, going from Facebook, for previous crap owners because of a herd mentality.

    #321611
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 185

    ‘once the herd get going’. Mooooo! Too much sun for you today shag.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321618
    AwaywegoAwaywego
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 20, 2017
    Topics: 195

    Butler doesn’t rate Beestin to be anymore than a bench warmer only played 60 mins or more in 6 games since early December and only one game of 90 mins. 16 of those games less than 45 mins, so obviously Butler doesn’t think he’s the answer.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321637
    NorthumbironNorthumbiron
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: January 3, 2014
    Topics: 73

    Plenty on here who don’t think Butler is the answer!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321644
    AwaywegoAwaywego
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 20, 2017
    Topics: 195

    All depends on what the questions are.
    Just doing ok overall for me, a lack lustre promotion, followed by a better season football wise but far to many bumps in the road for a real shot at promotion.
    He’s done good bringing players in on the attacking side overall, Less so defensively and goalie wise.
    Never wanted him in the first place just for being ex scunny, don’t want him even more so now because of his fan comments, many of the fans he moans about will be here long after he’s f off. But of course I hope succeeds will do whoever the manager is.
    Big season for him this season expectations will be higher, even more so now the 2 big money clubs have gone.
    We’ll all make a better judgement once the team is assembled.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321646
    scunnymatt88scunnymatt88
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 30, 2017
    Topics: 1

    Butler doesn’t rate Beestin to be anymore than a bench warmer only played 60 mins or more in 6 games since early December and only one game of 90 mins. 16 of those games less than 45 mins, so obviously Butler doesn’t think he’s the answer.

    Maybe if someone reminded butler that beestin is a former donny player that way he may get a few 90mins under his belt. As for ewing I’m all for wanting to better yourself but i think his statement is a complete pisstake and would rather want players who want to play for the club.

    #321647
    Iron-aweIron-awe
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 21, 2017
    Topics: 16

    Wonder when the playing budget will be announced or won’t it?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #321649
    AwaywegoAwaywego
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: June 20, 2017
    Topics: 195

    I think it’s fair to say that the club aren’t the best communicators on subjects like that, unless obviously they want your money.
    No matter what 64 says (he wants to live in a vacuum) fans want to here about those type of things, it sells the club or should do.
    Other clubs let you know how season ticket sales are doing and compare to the previous season, just little things to keep the natives interest up on a more positive note.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #321650
    RedMistTorpsFistRedMistTorpsFist
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: February 9, 2016
    Topics: 3

    As a few have said on here, my suspicion is that next season will be a slog. However, AB’s recruitment hasn’t been too bad on the whole (jones, ewing, westbrooke, howe, horton etc all picked up cheaply), but its probably going to take 2004-06 levels of effective wheeling and dealing to get players in here who can do a job on a shoestring. Think it’ll be clear within the first month what sort of a season we’re in for.

    Galatico approach is fallible as proved our first season in NLN, so big hitters chucking money around like FG/Carlisle etc isn’t necessarily terminal.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #321653
    ironfromafarironfromafar
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: October 10, 2021
    Topics: 34

    BIG WEEK INCOMING @ SUFC … cos Poz Dave says so

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.