There’s a difference between having no money and refusing to spend. Both of the came to the same conclusion much the same as Maguire said in that interview some owners finally don’t see it worthy of carrying on when all they get is grief.
Have we seen anywhere where Hilton didn’t have the money? Quite the contrary he had to show proof of funding down the line to be an owner to the fa the national league and Swanny which was corroborated by Elliott as well.
Will have had to do the same with Matlock, do you not question how he’s able to do it if he hasn’t got money behind him or the ability to borrow it.
If he hasn’t got any he’s one clever man to continue to dupe people and power to his arm for it.
