Forum Replies Created
-
7 users thanked author for this post.
Agree Ironawe. He was prepared to risk losing 1 point to try and gain 3.
Dean would have gone 5-4-1, dropped deep and probably lost that one.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I recall NM’s three on two attack mid-second half. A fantastic piece of alertness as Whitehall thundered back to help the defence out of desperate trouble.
Hit the woodwork twice and scored a penalty. A cat’s whisker away from a hat trick. His general play was better than Saturday.
Drop him?He wants to drop the man who has led the defence to 3 clean sheets and scored a couple of goals in his spare time as well.
Got to have a good reason to change a team that wins 3-0.
If Roberts is going to learn to play the 10 role he won’t learn it on the bench.
1-3 to the Iron.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Go easy Old Man
1 user thanked author for this post.
11 of 15 Brackley players from yesterday played in the play off final. Of the 4 replacements for this season 3 came from EFL or National League with the other from NLS winners.
Same manager as well so don’t think their quality has dipped. They had a 10 minute spell just after half time and another little burst late on. They can play if you let them. Both their spells were a result of our wing backs resorting to being full backs.
Always the danger when you let 3 at the back become a 5. If they keep playing with that intensity for 45 more games we will have a great season.
I just re-registered and got to the bit where they ask you for the code they have emailed you.
No email with code.
Enough to make you get a dodgy box!
1 user thanked author for this post.
I call it Barry Fry syndrome. No manager ever thinks they can have too many forwards.
Barry always had 8 or 9 on the books back in his managerial days. Still always on the lookout for another though.
1 user thanked author for this post.
If they covered every away game it would be £230 which is a decent wedge more than the cost of my old fogie season ticket for the 23 home games.
Not long ago in the EFL it was £140 for all 46 games streamed. In my opinion they are taking the Michael.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Hope it’s a better watch than last seasons league game there. One of the few games last year we didn’t look very interested.
Hoping for a performance this week as I have tickets for son, son in law and 2 grandsons. First time 3 generations of the family at an Iron game since my old man passed away.
Son in law and grandsons are southerners and Gooners so we’ll have to be good if I’m going to turn them!
3 users thanked author for this post.
Agree Ironawe. Debts now cleared or not quite cleared a club with almost 2,000 season ticket holders and likely in excess of 4,000 home crowds would expect play off places in the National League never mind NLN.
Not winning automatic promotion would be just as big a disappointment as it was last season. Failure to reach the play offs would be a disaster.
I am massively thankful and very proud of all that helped save our club (including my own small efforts) but the time has come to focus on the journey going forward. A journey that needs to end back in the EFL.
I don’t see this as “entitlement” of a big club at this level just simple economics.
7 users thanked author for this post.
Accepting 3 centre backs is a given I would agree with Cass on the starting 11 with Rowley missing out for me.
This assumes Denton is properly match fit.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Agree Cass but you wouldn’t be signing Roberts or Law if you were planning to play 3 at the back.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Given Butler is obviously going to stand or fall with 3 centre backs then I agree with SST regarding Denton, Roberts and Brogan have to start and also Scales at RWB.
I would also suggest Kouogan, Evans and Nicholson need to be the 3 as they can all pass the ball better than Boyce.
I would probably start with Whitehall and Carlton up front with Beestin getting 30 minutes – probably for Whitehall who has been poor throughout preseason.
One last moan about 3 at the back and then I will shut up about it. Whatever we think were the reasons we didn’t get promoted last season the one thing no-one could blame was our back four. Even Tamworth would have swapped theirs for ours. Why then is that the bit that needs changing? Apart from needing to replace Ogle obviously.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Few weeks ago went to Barton for a friendly and thought oh dear we don’t have much of a clue how to play 3 at the back. I didn’t think we had the right centre backs to play the system (i.e. ones that cam play a bit of football) and I didn’t see any wing backs in the squad (just 3 out and out full backs and 2 out and out wingers).
Just watched us play us play Chesterfield who I accept are much higher quality than anyone else we will play this season but sadly have seen nothing tonight or in any of the other friendlies to change my mind since the Barton game. 3 CB’s on the field with 2 full backs (sorry, wing backs) who probably see themselves primarily as centre backs and we still let the likes of Colclough win headers in the 6 yard box.
One of the reasons I dislike 3 centre backs at this level is invariably none of them can play any constructive football. If you compound this by playing out and out defenders as wing backs then 5 of your team offer no creativity.
When your 2 centre midfielders are Scales and Clunan who made about 3 assists and scored about 3 goals between them in a freescoring team last season then that puts an awful lot of pressure on your 10. Not surprisingly Rowley was not up to single handedly creating lots of chances. Not helped by the fact that whenever the midfield got the ball into the centre forward his poor touch set up a Chesterfield counter attack. This happened 4 or 5 times in the first half alone.
Only positive for the Iron was Chesterfield couldn’t be arsed to go on to get 6 or 7.
Will travel to Brackley in hope but very little expectation.
2 users thanked author for this post.
