Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Your presupposition that there is no God is seriously challenged in the videos.This is why you will not even look at them. The crack of the curtain if slightly opened will give you problems. You are saying there is no God ,but when your presuppositions are challenged you foolishly ignore them. If you think I am trying to “get one over you” ,you are sadly mistaken.
Because you have been brought up with nobody attacking your faith in atheism,using the well trusted lines atheists use about non- belief in a God etc having silent Christians not challenging your position or giving solid argumentation ,you feel threatened when someone challenges your presuppositions.
I call you living in foolishness because you do. No defence in your atheistic worldview. All the videos are to show this. You cannot defend your position of atheism and are unwilling to do so. Foolishness is a correct word to use.
😂😂😂😂😂. You have no response to the video and the other videos.
By the way what is a good faith debater? If you have compelling evidence ,how would I have a leg to stand on? You speak in riddles and foolishness.I would love you to take me down a peg or two,give rebuttals and give the flaws in the arguments presented. Go on Siderite ,give me a good kicking with solid arguments against the video.You know you want too.What’s stopping you?
…but that example can be analysed and dismissed as nonsense.
You realise debating the video I posted would leave you without a defence.
That’s the difference. That’s why you resort to foolishness.…iron -awe the first to prove my point.
I am claiming no-one has debated the recent videos I agree with. I am telling the truth,not trying to “catch someone out” and saying “got ya”. The truth is no-one on the atheist side is willing to debate. And there is a reason why. (waiting for the usual ad-hom attack,as always.)
NI—Let’s say your made up scenario was true, can you give any flawed arguments to the questions and answers ,that were “staged”. If so ,would be pleased to think about your objections.
“People losing interest in debating with your endless videos”!
No one has debated ANY of the videos😂
“There is no point in debating with BPG or engaging.There is no good faith in debate with him”
No one has debated ANY of the videos😂Any other takers on bringing down Turek’s flawed arguments ( the usual crew?)
Maybe they haven’t the time,as well!😂 What a surprise!!“I’ll perhaps come back to it.Either way it doesn’t have a bearing on or validate your desperate(😂)desire to prove absolute truth and’objective meaning via the existence of a God.”
Oh yes it does,and you know it.Your unwillingness to comment on the video shows deep down you know.Strawmanning a young student?
The truth is you have no defence for your worldview position.
If you did,your explanation for Turek’s flaws in his arguments would be posted thick and fast. Your,” I haven’t the time “, is an admission of your presuppositions being flawed.But hey,what does the Bible say!“I wish someone would stop him yapping and take him to task over every flaw in his argument”.
I agree with Frank Turek ,that’s why I posted the video.Please feel free to take him and me to task and explain every flaw in the argument.
This is what I was hoping you were going to do,rather than accusing him of academic bullying.Your post aug 15 6.23pm.
“Not a simple answer right or wrong and I have an issue with how this geezer Frank Turek has presented it.So I need more time to consider and give a lengthier response,needs a bit of unravelling IMO.”
You certainly answered the title of the thread.
You didn’t answer the video in any way on an intellectual level.the to and fro of the video,please give the objections to the questions asked,and how you would have responded.Your response to the questions posed by Turek weren’t answered with any sort of clarity. I think you understood the video and hopefully it will give you some thought. Once again thanks for watching it.
To be quite honest D66 your reply to the video is nonsensical. Your knowledge of great philosophers is not in doubt, Kierkegaard ( leap of faith) Sartre (existence precedes essence) Camus (absurdism) etc but the video wasn’t answered.
Oh dear,Northumbiron.
Showing a video and using the word plagiarism against me. 😂
A video you refuse to watch. Why not,and give a sound response to your position?Haven’t forgotten about this,Deeryme66??
…shame of brexit? You mean wanting control of our borders,being a sovereign country,wanting to decide our destiny with a democratically elected government. Wait a minute- when are the publics wishes going to materialise?
And if it doesn’t happen ,no doubt you’ll say..?!
If it doesn’t happen get back and give me an earful,Siderite.
You ridicule my opening post,but haven’t the confidence to state “Bill,you are a fool,this will not happen”. I wonder why? Then again ,I give you this opportunity to make this claim,so it’s on record.You ridicule my post about getting ready for mask mandates and lockdowns,Siderite,but this morning on(Pirola) declare ,I doubt mask mandates and lockdowns will return. When yours doubts end up with the reality on a return to authoritarian laws ( mask mandates and lockdowns) which have proven to lead to disastrous outcomes ,you will no doubt declare this was only the right thing to do.This never ending cycle of submission to a totalitarian ideology will lead to misery and chaos.
Why is your secular atheistic,materialistic,evolutionary worldview such a thankful way to live,yet when anyone who challenges this worldview,needs to get off their high horse? Why is it ok for you to say “ get off your high horse” and not for the objector to your worldview. You probably don’t understand your hypocrisy.
Do you agree or disagree with the video,Siderite?
…China,North Korea etc ..the chaos and misery of their ideology is slowly ( remember it is a long march) creeping into our camp.Hold onto you secular utopia for as long as you can,Siderite ( not realising it was underpinned by a Christian worldview).
Thought I would but this back on,Fans64.
The post on “ Bob Dylan”, you gave the idea nobody knew what “woke” meant,by posting a You tube clip.
I respond by this opening video,to completely state what “woke” means.
Some on here refused to look at it,looking at your post,I guess you didn’t either.The video shown earlier,what is woke ,can be clearly explained.
Critical Theory,intersectionality is cultural Marxism.
Liberalism in our secular worldview is also an anti Christian worldview.
Rebellion against our Creator leads to chaos and misery.What does woke mean. It really means Marxism,liberalism with an anti-Christian agenda. God’s law as written in the Bible is the way we have been instructed to live.Do we follow this law completely? No ,we are sinners and need a Saviour. If we try to follow the word of God it will lead to less chaos and misery.Following a woke(atheistic)worldview will lead to more chaos and misery.
The video that deals with our discussion is this one. Do you think it does?
-
AuthorPosts