29-3

Iron Bru Forums Blast Furnace 29-3

  • Author
    Posts
  • #294547
    fans6464
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: February 14, 2015
    Topics: 465

    5 at the back winning points wise

    #294548
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Just the kind of searing insight we have come to expect.

    Or alternatively 1.7 points a game with a back 5 – which doesn’t win automatic promotion.

    Or 3 points per game with a back 4 – which of course does win automatic promotion.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #294549
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 108

    And in %age terms ? vs 100.

    #294579
    fans6464
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: February 14, 2015
    Topics: 465

    Just the kind of searing insight we have come to expect.

    Or alternatively 1.7 points a game with a back 5 – which doesn’t win automatic promotion.

    Or 3 points per game with a back 4 – which of course does win automatic promotion.

    as much insight as those who claim that which took us to the top is all of a sudden crap and the only way forward is to go to back 4? We have poor players hardly capable of playing a pass quickly, no formation will change that .In fact 4-4-2 it could be argued gives clueless Clunan even more options for dull sideways passes

    #294581
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 46

    Too small a sample size to judge.

    We will probably be returning to a back 5 once the centre backs have got through their yellow card suspensions.

    Interesting to see Man U playing a more expensive version of Butlerball yesterday. Centre backs that can’t pass forward and wing backs that don’t know how to play the position. Outnumbered in midfield and no service to the forwards. Initiative handed to lesser skilled opposition.

    Just like watching the Iron.

  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.