That’s alot better, Heath. Maybe address you remarks to 64. Not sure if it will make any difference but I absolutely agree that the C of E establishment are in tatters.
My point to 64 was that he decries the amount of ‘bile’ being spewed in society ..but has a consistent track record himself. If you look at his opener above .. none of the ‘pervs’ are in the House if Lords. Just those who lacked discernment and courage to address serious issues. They are rightly being called to account for leadership failing. BUT ..in my humble opinion … their abject leadership failings don’t warrant being called ‘pervs’, maybe cowards or befuddled. More worryingly .. for a man who hates ‘bile’ .. what is the reason for highlighting their skin colour or religious persuasion. Imagine 64s high moral ground grandstanding if someone referenced the Rochdale or Rotherham groomers in terms of skin colour or Islam.
