Maybe if you got off your high horse you would be able to understand the point. OP was using casualties to suggest Netanyahu is worse than Bin Laden. I was saying that civilian casualties are higher in many other conflicts too, but this doesn’t make us worse. That’s it. Using WWII to point out the flaws in the argument is valid.
Your argument is that the different context of WWII makes it invalid, so I ask, are civilian deaths ok in different circumstances? It’s the only way my comparison would be invalid.
