So Gurny, it’s OK for the world to spend trillions, which could be used to fight disease, and deny the use of cheap energy, which could pull billions out of poverty, to “err on the side of caution”?! If the odds were in favour of climate change being the disaster claimed by the likes of Guterres you might have a point, but even the majority of climate scientists don’t believe this.
Your comment about evidence is ironic to say the least, as is your reference to cults. If you look at the science and the data we are not heading on a road to climate hell. Nor is it what the vast majority of climate scientists are saying. It seems astonishing that for someone who clearly loves to give the impression of having a planet-sized intellect you’re actually taken in by this stuff. Except, of course, that it fits exactly with your left-wing agenda. As I say, ironic to say the least.
The rest of your post is just the same old stuff you always come out with, which for someone who is supposed to understand psychology reveals far more about your own state of mind than anyone else’s. Obsessed with extreme left-wing ideology you simply cannot accept anyone who doesn’t see the world in the same way as you.
None of the above comments surprise me in the slightest. It’s the usual stuff from the usual suspects; and I’ve given up trying to explain to siderite the huge difference between understanding man-made climate change is real, with which I agree, but that it’s going to lead to catastrophe, which is absurd.
The real catastrophe is how billions are being forced into poverty as a result of this nonsense.
