Ferrite—-When reading your post, it clearly is saying that the two records of Cox and Hill are about the same, so does this not suggest that you are pointing out that theere is no difference in the two managers!!!!!!, it certainly does to me.
Did you read the full post fella? If so, you’ll have seen this bit:
“I think every Iron fan would agree that we look better under Hill yet we’re still absolutely terrible and average under a point a game. So what does that say about how bad a squad we have? About where the actions of the board over the last few years have brought us?”
My point is changing the manager, improving the manager, does not seem to have actually improved the team. That’s pretty worrying, no?
