Les—-I am a bit baffled regarding a couple of things that you have said mate, firstly in your first statement that introduced this topic, you were saying that 90% of rating marks would be covered by 6, 7 or 8 marks and that an odd 5 thrown in, and that this range of marks should cover all ratings, then later you then say that you have issued ZERO marks to three refs, so which one is correct????. Just to add, in my opinion it is not out of the question for a mark of 4 to be given, as an example my two 4 ratings for Rowe and O’Malley, because they both had very poor games against Walsall, and on occasions I feel that a player having an outstanding game should qualify for a 9, just my opinion, but I would think that many football fans will agree with this!!!!.
