Reply To: PLAYER RATING V MORCAMBE

[bartonscorpion]

It really feels like a defeat with their 93rd min goal, although after the first half hours pl;ay Morcambe were easily the better team and should really have won. Same aswe said last week, we cannot bring the full team back into our third of the pitch and hope to hold out, last Tuesday it worked with a bit of luck, but to set out every game with this system is not a good idea, and we will come unstuck many times.

HOWARD—7—Better game today, but still has no control of his goal area.
ROWE—8–Had a good game today and is looking a good prospect.
McGAHEY–8–Solid in defence, a few passes overhit, but played ok.
ONARISE–8—Also played well and is a good pairing with McGahey.
BROWN—5—Not one of his better games, anfar too many back passes.
GILLIED—6—Had a good first half, but was missing most of the 2nd half.
SPENCE–6–Did ok and worked hard, but no help given to attack.
–BEESTIN—9—My MOM, Worked hard throughout the game, an some clever passes.
LOFT—4—He had a terrible game, and although no through balls to him, lost it mainly.
eisa–5—10% of his game was very good, but 90% was very poor.
KVV—4—Should never have started the match, a big risk that went wrong.

REF—5—Seemed to lose it at times, and a bit whistle happy.

COX—6—Should not have risked KVV, and should have MvAtee in place of Loft in my opinion, coming on after 80 mins is no good, and once again dropping all players into defence and hoping to hold out for 25 mins is stupid. And still insists on bringing on Hippolite?????

PREDICTION LEAGUE—-Very annoying, at 92 min stage of matches I had 28 points, and at 95th min had 9 points, because of goals by Morcambe and Forest Green.