‘The defence looked all at odds a couple of times’.
I’m intrigued by this point Apollo as, according to Stuart Maw, the defence looked ‘solid and composed’
Would you say apart from those couple of times, it was okay?. Or is ‘strong and composed’ over positivity talking?
The truth of the matter is Chesterfield could easily have had 5 or 6 and should certainly have had 2 or 3. Which does not suggest solid or composed.
In the interest of balance and positivity the Iron could have had 3 or 4.
Lots of things to be positive about the performance but the defence being solid/strong and composed was not one of them.
