Bpg’s video claims to be an argument against evolution, but it’s only argument against evolution itself is that apparently people don’t look at the other options (despite the fact that evolution is scientific, a hypothesis has been provided, and generations of scientists have tested AGAINST the hypothesis – unlike the religious acceptance of the contents of a single book). The rest of the video is merely showing they don’t understand the difference between evolution (how life changes over time, using DNA, fossil records and observed changes as evidence), cosmogenesis (how the universe came to being), abiogenesis (how life came from non-life) and morality . We know a lot less about cosmogenesis, making it an easier argument by religious folks to believe in a creator (but there are various other possibilities). There are valid debates on abiogenesis too. Evolution, however, has vast evidence supporting it’s existence, arguing against requires more than a book saying sloths were created by a divine being and they travelled from mount Ararat to central America without leaving a trace
