‘Sustainability’ was mentioned and Sharp said the club are not a million miles off it, or some such. That mixed in with ‘7 figure’ investments (in reality loans?) and the need to bring in more investment to achieve ‘sustainability’ but also needing to pay the loans back in the future: I’m struggling to marry this up. How can we be truly sustainable while we owe loans back? Essentially in debt. Maybe I’ve misunderstood but the maths / logic doesn’t quite add up. If there is another forum in the future it would be helpful if the fiscal side was explained in a little more detail. Right now, debts in the form of loans whilst seeking more investment (loans?) does not equal sustainability, I don’t think. One thing’s for sure, if FCbollocks had gone ahead and been successful (highly debatable), the current Directors loans might have been paid back.
