That was based on information that we had at the time and some suppositions* based on his own history with claiming he’d been hard done by because of meanies like Taft, Bru, Matt Slater and every Tom, Dick and Harry who has it in for poor Dave. With new information things change, obviously. Though, given none of what has been said has refuted that he did leave, I don’t think it really makes interpretations at the time (with less information) any more unfair. Hilton’s history is bound to create cynicism.
*I mean this is no different to your own suppositions that Montel had betrayed poor Dave, as well as the 250k bad debt being for the stadium, there are no boardroom rifts because they held hands etc, lol
