Sid, to go down that way of thinking (that Letby must be guilty) and stay doggedly locked into it no matter what, is a hinderance when there is new information to consider.
It’s a mindset that denies any evidence which contradicts tightly held beliefs, and shuts out any dissenting voices. It’s what led to Brexit, and the PO, and other cases too. There’s more than a whiff of this to the Letby case.
Unlike the ‘expert’ Dame Edna and her pooch, I don’t know if Letby is innocent or not, but there appears to be an increasing amount of new information which suggests the original decision could be faulty. If that information comes from reputable sources, which it does, I’m prepared to listen to it and think again. We all should.
