The polls in 2016 may have had a pro-Clinton bias, even though the polls were within the margin of error, but this is a load of nonsense. Most polls had the last election as a 50/50, with some favouring Trump slightly. The one Selzer poll which suggested otherwise was an outlier. Now pro-free speech Trump has said he will go after her for an incorrect poll. Last time I checked, a crap poll isn’t a crime, nor should it be, and it’s bizarre to see people who claim to be pro-free speech to try and justify it with nonsense about election interference.
Also, the whole of the US media was on Harris’s side? Really? Even Fox News? Anyway, all outlets have some degree of bias and anyone pro-free speech wouldn’t be against an opposing viewpoint being aired, even if biased. Yet criticisms in the media are being muted through fears of Trump retaliating because of his own threats, which go against the free speech narrative.
Yes, some liberal outlets have been cloying and hostile to other views, but this isn’t the right alternative.
