You misunderstand 64. There was no lack of evidence nor any posts deleted. To simplify:-
Back in October Deerey directed us to Stu’s X account to check out some posts in which he was defending Butler.
I pointed out that only a few post previous Stu was asking for ‘nudes’ and so on to which Deerey promptly replied that it was ‘social media nativity’.
Stu’s tweets were there for all to see, Deerey acknowledged them himself, there was no lack of evidence.
My point is that when Stu’s making all the right noises he’s ‘naive’ but now he’s criticised both the manager and the trust there’s no defending it as naivety and we’re jumping on the bandwagon that he’s a pervert.
Double standards from some is the point I’m making.
