I’m no Swann apologist, at all, but I do appreciate fairness and balance.
As I said earlier, Swann removing GP from the club and transferring it to Foolsilk was totally unforgivable (from a club and community perspective) but understandable (from a selfish business perspective).
Additionally, which do people find preferable? Swann’s method of dealing with those people who questioned him and called out, or Hilton’s? In other words: Solicitor’s letter or vile online attacks, doxxing and threats?
