‘Finished second and scored 84 – best in the league. Goal difference – 46 best in the league. Went out on a playoff penalty.’
Personally, I don’t think these ‘more important’ numbers tell the full story Gurney. Taking them in isolation masks a lot of negative aspects already well rehearsed on this thread and others.
‘Fans have such short memories, but just think back. At the start of the season when the club’s very survival was in doubt, would anyone on here have thought those numbers unacceptable? Would anyone on here possessed of their faculties have thought they would be grounds for managerial renewal?’
I don’t think it’s healthy or wise to live in the past or view it from an earlier time. We are where we are, in the here and now with the future to think about carefully and strategically. That said, the Board will decide and I’m happy to support it. Just opinions and if he stays who knows, he may just succeed?
