I find on here, you can have quite an interesting debate. You might not agree with others and others might not agree with you but you are allowed to voice our opinion in our club without the threat of your post being removed, just as long as you stick to the rules (which to be honest shouldn’t be to hard).
On the Facebook site especially during the Hilton era, if your post didn’t suit that days narrative it was removed without warning, although I did think some of the posts were comedic and obviously taking the mic of the members of the Facebook group that took everything as gospel.
I think what owners/chairman(women) of football clubs and supporters of their regime don’t like is when faceless individuals critique the way they conduct their business and the way that they run the football club (they forget that just because their name is above the door, it doesn’t make it theirs. They are custodians and without the fans/supporters the football club would disappear). As long as that criticism is constructive, truthful and non-libellous then I don’t see the problem. Their problem is that they can’t bully that person into being quiet when they probably are used to that happening.
