I ask the question why has Keith Waters resigned and why was he asked to do so as Hilton said.? Is this another non-disclosure? He was vice-chairman.
This seems very odd particularly as apparently the other directors remain.
WHAM said he will make no further statements. Did he just recently bring in the other directors because he knew what was about to unfold and has left them to make the unpopular decisions which are about to unfold and they will take all the flack.
I was of the opinion at the time that it was a very strange decision to suddenly appoint so many directors particularly after him saying he was going to run the club and him cancelling the previous directors including vice-presidents Keith Waters and Ian Botham. Where was the sense in that. I always thought it good to have their two prestigious names connected with SUFC.
