It’s a clear choice.
We either pontificate and try to make DH so uncomfortable that he walks away – with the concomitant 95% (???) probability that the club folds
OR
We make the best of a bad job; learn to control our ‘oh-so justifiable moral outrage’ and perhaps give the man space to breathe. After all that has been stated in anger – we now need calmness. Oodles of it!
Let us, at least, make it possible for him to stay.
The one thing that may well separate him from the previous owners appears to be that he seemingly cares whether our club survives or not.
When our very survival hangs in the balance – I rather wish that some on here would learn to look at the big picture FIRST!
I would have expected better from you Les than this reductive simplistic summation. How do we even know we have been “saved” at the moment?
The ground has not been purchased. Taft is citing unpaid wages. CCJs. Is there more fire under that smoke?
There’s far more valid reasons for concern than “moral outrage” although, for what it’s worth, I think holding the custodians of our club to a high moral standard is no bad thing.
