If only the institutions were impartial and didn’t investigate a president for rule breaking. That always ends well.
Sarcasm aside, I do find that view concerning among Republicans. The idea that it’s sacriligeous to hold democratic standards against someone where there is reason to suspect there’s been rule breaking. Typically, it’s only been against their guy though. Wanting Democrats locked up, no matter how spurious, is often fair game.
That will be it here. No discussions from me on this now, given that this is a football thread.
