You responded to my post on your general debating style, yet you responded with an attempt to discredit this with a reference to no-one debating the videos. Yet you have repeatedly got into debates with this previously, or is this being denied now? I recall having several, and people grow weary because of your debating style. I do not believe you when you claim not to be out for wins or gotchas when you seem to see people’s boredom with your input on this topic as some win and irrefutable proof that it can’t be answered. It’s beyond your comprehension to even look at yourself in the mirror and understand how your debating style is impacting others. It cannot be that you bore people, irritate them with refusals to understand other points of view, no. It has to be because you are right all along and everyone else cannot hope to match your superior mindset. Convenient.
While you’re on about ad hominem fallacies, you might want to look into things like the fallacy fallacy, because assuming your position is right because you think others have made a poorly argued point against this vid isn’t proof of you being correct or atheists not being able to answer the point because they can’t (rather than can’t be arsed).
