Well Hilton showed proof of funds which went through Swanns solicitors, so he must have. If he didn’t show proof of funds he would have never found himself in a position to become chairman.
Definitely showed proof of funds. That’s a certainty because I’m sure I read a statement from Swann himself when he mentioned it. If you show proof of funds then you must have the money.
My understanding is that he’s waiting for Swann to sort the problems before purchasing but swann was reluctant, therefore Hilton never bought the ground. This could easily be solved if Swann just sorted out the problems but appeared that Hilton mentioning the things he was worried to Swann got his back up and he’s dug his heels in.
FFS Burney, you’ve logged onto the wrong forum, you should be on the happy clappers Facebook.
