Reply To: Ernest Pawn v Dildo van Hit

Iron Bru Forums Blast Furnace Ernest Pawn v Dildo van Hit Reply To: Ernest Pawn v Dildo van Hit

#268699
PaulSanfran49
Participant
Offline
Registered On: December 23, 2013
Topics: 103

It is about the stadium and the land. Anything to do with the football club – tax, wages etc won’t be relevant. Swann somehow put GP into the ownership of a separate company, unchallenged at the time, so that part is over.

How do you challenge anything as the club was owned by the ego ! The predominant name of board members was SWANN so they will do as instructed.