Perhaps Hilton should look into that document and look to launch legal action.
Of course the contents of it would cause alarm at the time, given the nature of it. It’s why such libellous material is worthy of court action. We can argue the toss about how many maybe didn’t exercise enough critical thinking at the time, but it’s now seen as nothing. The creator did not spout pages of abuse on here; the document was created elsewhere, and first shared to The Fishy of Grimsby Town. We’re not responsible for the crap posted on some google document which gets shared here.
Scepticism of owners is commonplace. Sometimes it goes overborad, but I don’t want there to be a situation where it’s not allowed. I wouldn’t trust any owner who sees such as abuse. The last owner was thin skinned to criticism and that should have been a red flag.
