The letter dated 07/07/23 from Mitchell Wilde LLP to Knights which has been posted on Facebook makes for an interesting read.
1) Why has Hilton reaffirmed his willingness to pay £3M for GP when the club claims to have acquired a new site for a stadium that’s going to be ready in 20 months?
2) Why would Hilton’s offer of £3M be subject to a conveyancing period? I thought conveyancing had already been completed which had highlighted the issues reported by Hilton?
3) Why would Hilton be so keen to prevent Peter Swann or anyone connected to him from opposing any planning applications during the conveyancing process?
