Strange how some on FB want to pick non existant holes in Bru posts and now the Trust statement, reporting that ” Both parties say that they want the best for SUFC and its fans” is seen as supporting Swann over Hilton, a bizarre conclusion to say the least. The earlier statement ” Over the years we have at times been very critical of Mr Swann: running up club debt, stopping fans and the Trust from buying shares in SUFC, ignoring fan groups, removing club assets to Coolsilk etc.” would seem to me to make their position very clear.
For added clarity I am not the author of this statement.
Where can I find Hiltons “retaliation” please?
