I think when the dust settles, it would be beneficial to think ahead about the implications of Mr Swann’s statement and where this leaves Hilton / White / Anderson (whatever his real name is), rather than ranting about Swann himself, when the chances are he’s not going to reply. We can’t turn back the clock and do anything about it now. It may also be worth some posters reviewing the many previous questions and concerns raised on here and elsewhere, in a different light.
