I think the reality was we nearly didn’t have a club.
If we have to ground share then so be it. Or should we just hand over of fist pay up. Does that sit well with all?
The only positivity atm is we have a club and a fan base anything extra that comes our way is a bonus.
Buckle up because we are in for some turbulence how severe is an unknown.
There are a lot of assumptions over what is a reasonable valuation and we are only hearing on side of the story. I am yet to be convinced Hilton can afford a new stadium if he can’t afford GP, and I am not convinced that Swann is in the wrong over any negotiations falling apart.
He came in during January claiming ground and all had been saved, yet we’re supposed to be happy with potentially sharing a ground, while making no money off home games?
Would anyone believe the other side of the story?
We’ve got be happy with the hand we’ve got atm. It’s not our money to criticise who’s doing what with their money.
