A hyperbolic term maybe, but the facts are that we don’t know his plans, and some of his decisions have been poor to date. Yet some seem to bash anyone remotely critical or sceptical of Hilton, and I am not just talking about the wild conspiracists either. They get called Swann lovers, codheads in disguise and more. It’s them who need to have a word with themselves in my opinion, because while it’s welcome Hilton moved for the club, we have to be grounded and sceptical, in my opinion.
Instead such gets greeted with accusations of hating Hilton or wanting the club to fail. Same sort of rhetoric used against Swann critics, of which I was one, post-2020ish.