A quick search of his profile shows the first post to be from 2020 with a post or two not complimentary towards Swann.
Stop taking it out on fans because they don’t worship the ground Hilton walks on. Concerns about Hilton can be brushed away as unfounded, no matter what (and some seemingly are), but we can assert other fans are conspiracists based on nothing? That’s no better than Rene’s conspiracies.
8 posts in 3.5 years of Swann 1 of which was mildly critical of him.
35 since Hilton arrived virtually all have been posts that would have had Swann contacting his lawyers had they been about him. I still think my question was valid and fair.
I direct you to my post below and say what does it matter who did what with Swann’s tenure at this point? What matters now is whether Hilton is good enough. We can only learn from mistakes, which was putting blind trust in Swann the charlatan. I don’t think the lesson is to blindly trust the next guy.
The litigious nature of Swann could be one reason for why there wasn’t more leaks from him/her and others.
