I should also add that I was confused by it and was sceptical of the river claim. There is nothing wrong with that. What I have issue with here is the arrogant talk of doing a better job, when we didn’t know as much as the police, didn’t know the entire focus of their investigation and were certain. Many were talking as if their knowledge was infallible, to the point they were blaming people for murder.
The case was odd, and many things were suspicious, but the evidence wasn’t there for any hypothesis from the amateur. Yet they were speaking as if it was unquestionable for whatever pet theory they had.
