Iron Bru › Forums › Blast Furnace › Daniel and Whitehouse › Reply To: Daniel and Whitehouse
cassidystash wrote: Don’t agree that Daniels was a bad signing, utility players always necessary in a small squad, but his injury record is worrying. Fully agree with the rest of your post.
Don’t agree that Daniels was a bad signing, utility players always necessary in a small squad, but his injury record is worrying. Fully agree with the rest of your post.
ironking wrote: Daniels was a poor signing from the onset, but could certainly do a better job at fullback than the hapless give a goal away a game O Malley. Whitehouse is an holding midfielder and would suit our midfield at the moment and allow playing a back four instead of a back five. It would also allow Butterfield to push on and play to his strongest attribute ie being a creative player. Daws is clueless.
Daniels was a poor signing from the onset, but could certainly do a better job at fullback than the hapless give a goal away a game O Malley.
Whitehouse is an holding midfielder and would suit our midfield at the moment and allow playing a back four instead of a back five.
It would also allow Butterfield to push on and play to his strongest attribute ie being a creative player.
Daws is clueless.
Omalley one of better players on pitch hes not to blame for goals he threw is self at everyone other week
