Couldn’t support the idea of O’Malley on the left of a MF 3
If we were to play 4/3/3 with Whitehouse, Beestin and Butterfield in CM, then that will be a solid enough base to allow O’Malley enough freedom to bomb down the left and get crosses in but agree with you in that I would much prefer 2 strikers up top.
4/3/1/2 formation would do me and have the width coming from the FB’S. I also understand the frustration with Hill fucking about with the strikers. Why not just stick two up top and have them through the middle and allow the midfielders and full backs to provide the ball ?
What is his fascination on playing Nuttall as a wide, split striker ?. I don’t get it, he’s more of a winger at times. Not quite sure what Hill is trying to do.
