Yet premature births happen and can survive. After a certain time period this is more likely, and this is around the time a limit should be.
If you bothered reading, and understanding what I had said, I included the term surviving without the uterus. In other words, where they can be truly described as alive and sentient in the meaning we understand with another human being. Do you think that newborn babies need to be placed back into the uterus after birth to survive? The fact you can’t parse simple sentences doesn’t impress me. I am not saying that babies don’t need support, but they can survive without the benefit of a uterus and are sentient. A 16 week old fetus will have next to zero chance of survival, even with medical intervention. After 24 weeks, roughly, the chances increase. This was what my point was referring to, so please try and properly read before sounding off, with arrogant proclamations about the logic behind an argument you do not understand.
Calling a a zygote, fetus or embryo not a baby is not dehumanising, it’s what it is, and what you are demanding women to be controlled for, including for rape, incest and risk of death. You seem to think as soon as the sperm meets the ova it is alive in the sense of a baby.
