Very strange.

Iron Bru Forums Blast Furnace Very strange.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #243965
    Iron147Tom
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: February 2, 2016
    Topics: 24

    Mr Hill…

    How did you think playing a 17 year old upfront which only Nuttall anywhere near him going to work?

    Why have we ended up playing 5 at the back against Bromley and a side that has scored 1 goal in 5 before us?

    Why can’t it be kept simple and just play a standard 4-4-2 instead of fancy formations?

    Why is Nuttall always unbelievably isolated all the time?

    Other than that it’s all good

    #243966
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 173

    Stop asking sensible questions Tom!

    #243967
    NorthumbironNorthumbiron
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: January 3, 2014
    Topics: 71

    Why have we won only 3 of your 39 games in charge?

    7 users thanked author for this post.
    #243968
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 173

    Lol, are you disrespecting Keef?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #243970
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 173

    Why have we won only 3 of your 39 games in charge?

    It’s because the players are lacking confidence, apparently

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #243977
    WonderGoalsWonderGoals
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 27, 2013
    Topics: 103

    Hill’s a lunatic. As said above playing 5 at the back with Butterfield dropping deep for added protection against a team that had scored 1 goal before today. The he plays a youth player upfront who’s actually a winger.

    Only keef could think of that. I know what that Tranmere was going on about now.

    Hill’s a tactical car crash. To compound the thoughtless tactics it sounds like he has little to no relationship with Turnbull and only answers to Swann.

    This club is absolutely crackers.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #243979
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 116

    It is difficult to defend the decision to play Wallace but I can just about accept the experiment – I suppose.
    Why he was not subbed after 25 minutes though, is utterly beyond me.
    If we’d signed Rob Apter, we must have known that his abilities were far more polished than those of Wallace.
    Ergo, Apter should have started.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #244013
    FerriteFerrite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 102

    It is difficult to defend the decision to play Wallace but I can just about accept the experiment – I suppose.

    We’re back to the “chucking in untried youngsters” stage again. Just like all those youngsters we played last season who now are apparently nowhere to be seen.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.