No number 3 or number 9. Can’t believe out of all those strikers, none of them have been given the number 9 shirt. Does that mean we are signing another or that the ones we have are all crap?
I bet we’ll probably ship Olomola out and get another striker in who’s seen as a reliable goal scorer. Now, whether whoever it is is or not is another matter entirely.
MacAtee is #9 (4+5=9)
Olomola has Sharp’s #24
So all good then!
Don’t like McAtee at 45, looks suspiciously like a ‘token’ number that’s unlikely to be used. Hope I’m wrong (not unusual) and not just a cynical old b*****d.
Numbers would suggest there are ins and outs still to come.
I hope Watson doesn’t look at what fans say about him online. Unless we sign another keeper, Watson will start for us next season, give him some support.
“Same as his number from last year isn’t it Cass?”
Can’t remember Ferrite, but if it is then I’m wrong again! Thanks for pointing that out, are you Mrs CT in disguise? Good job I included being wrong as a possibility.
As I like to say about myself “sometimes right, sometimes wrong but ALWAYS certain!”
To be honest, I can’t remember for definite one way or the other about McAtee but I remember he had a high number and it seems unlikely he’d have been “relegated” to number 45.
McAtee hasn’t changed. Some just stick with their numbers. I can’t see us signing another LB I imagine Butroid was given the chance to take 3 and opted to keep 16. 9 is the only surprise would’ve expected one of the new lads to take it.
Watson has had plenty of support and time to learn and improve. It’s not happening.
We might be stuck with him and if we are then we’re going nowhere.
He’s not too bad but he’s not a no 1 GK, he’s provide back up but that’s about it. I hope Cox talks Swann into signing an experienced, more reliable GK.
.
