Registered On: May 8, 2017
It strikes me that Bucks thinks there is a problem, but it’s not such a big problem that contributes to the current trends of global catastrophes. The problem for me is that he’s comfortable with ignoring scientists (because of who they’re in pay of-though the specifics are scant here so it borders on conspiracy theorist territory) when it suits him but presumably is happy to put his faith in scientists when it suits. In other words, make it up as you go along to fit your agenda. That’s what doesn’t hold in my opinion. It’s a flimsy argument.